Sunday, March 17, 2024

Not Secure

We pay a lot of money for "security", to the military and to other government organizations. A LOT OF MONEY.

What do we get in return?

Spy balloons in our skies.

Drone swarms over sensitive installations:

https://www.twz.com/air/mysterious-drones-swarmed-langley-afb-for-weeks

And now thousands of drones crossing our southern border:

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/pentagon-commander-reveals-alarming-number-drone-incursions-us-mexico-border

Not only were we UNPROTECTED on 9/11, now our borders appear completely OPEN to anyone and anything who wants to enter our country for reasons unknown.

THIS IS BS !!!

We need a government that is going to protect us; not one which sends billion$ of weapons to Israel and Ukraine while leaving us defenseless.

Clearly "Joe Biden" and crew cannot handle the job.

Tuesday, March 12, 2024

Quo Vadis, Victoria ???

You may have heard that Victoria Nuland has resigned her position in the US State Department and is expected to retire. Some of that may be true.

You also may have heard that NATO will soon be choosing a new chief, and here is a report on possible candidates for the position:

https://www.dw.com/en/who-will-finally-be-the-next-nato-chief/a-67855736

I would not surprised if Ms. Nuland were to get the job ... or at least get to play an important related role.

Considering that TPTB are shifting their murderous focus to China, here are some things that make sense to me:

  • They want to keep the pressure on Russia and drive a wedge between Russia and China;
  • They want to make China into the chief enemy while shifting the main burden of the Ukraine war to NATO (i.e., away from Biden or his successor); and
  • They want to declare "victory" no matter the outcome. If Ukraine loses, the EU will get blamed, and not the US. If Ukraine wins, the US will take all the credit in spite of the EU's efforts.

Considering these possibilities, does it make sense to sideline one of the chief architects and behind-the-scenes generals of this entire crusade?

Of course not.

Thursday, March 7, 2024

Bill of Attainder

In their frenzied haste to do away with President Trump, some members of Congress plan to pass legislation stating that he committed the crime of insurrection on January 6, 2021.

This is expressly forbidden by the US Constitution, as it would be a "bill of attainder":

Article I, Section 9

3. No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

I believe that Section 5 of the 14th Amendment does NOT override Article I, Section 9, para. 3 of the main document. Congress can now pass legislation defining how to implement Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, but Trump would first have to be convicted of the appropriate crime in a court of law, with all the benefits of due process.

It would be nice if our Representatives and Senators would take the time to read, understand, and follow our Constitution ... all of it.

Notable Lists

 Found today on the Internet:


Saturday, March 2, 2024

Anarchy In The UK ???

Here is a wonderful critique of the PM of the UK:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/mar/01/rishi-sunak-purposefully-grips-his-lectern-but-shows-he-has-no-grip-of-the-country

I think it would be helpful if OUR "newspapers" would analyze "Joe Biden" in the same manner. Instead we get myriad distortions and outright lies about Trump, which at this point serve little purpose other than to help keep him out of the White House.

Please tell us the FACTS, and we'll decide for ourselves what they mean.

The COVID Debacle

Here is an EXCELLENT roundup of the distortions and lies behind the COVID debacle. I highly recommend everyone at least scan the summaries of the testimony:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/this-senate-panel-on-the-vaccines

Here's a sample of the findings:

In 1962, children received 5 vaccine doses, and in 1986, the schedule expanded to 25 doses of 5 different vaccine formulations. Shortly after the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the law was amended to essentially erect a liability shield protecting vaccine manufacturers, and the schedule expanded dramatically. By 2023, 73 doses of 16 different vaccine formulations were given to children up to age 18. [As we discovered through lawsuits] the FDA approved these formulations individually only with minimal and inadequate safety testing, and the CDC has never tested the cumulative effect of the vaccine schedule on childhood health outcomes.

And as you might expect, our children's health outcomes are much worse than kids who are NOT exposed to these harmful injectable products.

"Our" government really does not seem to have our best interests in mind. Not even close.

And it's about time we demand to know why.

Update - 3/6/2024

Here is a 14-minute edited version of the hearing which captures many important points:

https://x.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1763324208401068314?s=20

Thursday, February 22, 2024

Brave New World ???

Saw this statistic on the Internet today:

Roughly 2% of (US) births per year are estimated to be from IVF.

If that is true, it might explain why the US has been letting so many people just waltz across our border.

It certainly implies some sort of fertility problem, which probably is related to our lifestyle - bad air, bad water, bad food, too much stress, too many STDs, taking too many harmful drugs, etc.

No doubt the people we're letting in don't suffer from such problems.

And all this suggests "the great replacement" actually is underway, just not for the reason(s) many believe. It's a response to an existential crisis, one of which "our" government seems to be aware.